![]() |
Moosa Ismail: Former STO MD |
Moosa Ismail's participation is not just symbolic. As a man who once headed one of the Maldives' most critical state-run businesses, an economic arm with tentacles reaching far into international trade and political stability, his signature means more than 'I'm with you.' It signals strategy. It signals sovereignty. It's a reassertion of national dignity, a move that should reassure you of the movement's strategic direction.
But he was not alone. Today, its participation was like dominoes falling – not just those stalwarts already listed from the law, academia, civil service, youth movements, defence industries, and business, but many other leading figures who wanted their names attached to that petition, not in protest but in reclamation. This is not a protest movement. This is a constitutional correction, a national resumption. A people reclaiming what was always theirs, and you are an integral part of this diverse and united community.
The Maldivians4Chagos Petition is not a desperate document but a legal statement and political assertion. The message it sends to the United Nations, the International Court of Justice and every diplomat complicit in the erasure of our history is this: we have never ceded Chagos — not in law, not in memory, not in spirit.
The Maldives's exclusion from 20th-century colonial roundtables should not be misconstrued as forfeiture. What Mauritius gave up under colonial excision is not ours to endure. Lennon, the Colonial Secretary of Ceylon (Sri Lanka) in the 19th century, did not illustrate our connections to the Chagos on maps; instead, we establish these connections through centuries of navigation, Islamic authority, and a consciousness of sovereignty. This historical and legal basis of our claim should inform you and instil confidence in the legitimacy of our movement.
To our political class, silence is no longer a neutral stance. It is negligence.
And to the world: This is not a question of borders. It's about broken treaties, falsified histories, and extinguished indigenous rights. Our argument does not rely on fraudulent identities or colonial remains; it rests on the continuity of the pre-colonial, the sovereignty of the Muslim and the strategic imperative of defending what belongs to us.
And to Mauritius and its echo chambers: You may have scripted a scene on the ICJ stage, but history does not bend for courtroom drama. The Indian Ocean is not yours to divide, and the Maldives isn't yours to speak for.
And for every Maldivian with a memory, a sense of justice and a shred of dignity, the time is always now to sign. Moosa Ismail has. Many others have. Will you?